sl114 Posted November 22, 2007 Share Posted November 22, 2007 Exactly what i was thinking, however as everything, its down to the driver Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sinbad Posted November 22, 2007 Share Posted November 22, 2007 At the end of the day the zed is a sports car and the ST is a hothatch so you cant compare them, but IMO, and, granted, with the tweaks my ST has, there is very little in it and im very happy with my purchase, which is the main thing! I wasnt intending on upsetting anyone on here with comments on the ST's performance compared to the zed- I loved my zed and drove it how it was designed to be driven! I'm sure people won't mind you making a quick comparison. I would have thought the ST, especially in your spec will be much quicker than a Zed. +1 id have to agree with that. Having followed my friends standard RS (who i would say had similar talents ) in the Zed i only had the edge at motorway speeds, so with the ST which im sure is a fair bit quicker with 290bhp would be faster than the Zed. Not that it matters much.... but it does put in perspective what youve got under your right foot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ir_fuel Posted November 22, 2007 Share Posted November 22, 2007 Not that it matters much.... but it does put in perspective what youve got under your right foot. But then again, if we compare the noise coming out the tail of both cars there is no comparison Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.