Jump to content

Clarkson suspended by the BBC..!!


WhackyWill

Recommended Posts

Producers at the Beeb have been told to make savings across the board in 2015 of

 

at least between 10% to 25% on production costs on ALL programs.

 

Maybe Clarkson's dinner was one of those cuts. :scare:

 

Not everything in TV is black and white now.. :scare:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TG makes a billion times more money than it costs to make. It's probably the most profitable show on the whole BBC. If anything was ring fenced from cuts, it would be TG.

Plus all the merchandise: DVD's/books/board games etc and selling makers rights to other countries.

 

Definitely the most profitable show on the BBC I'd wager. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TG makes a billion times more money than it costs to make. It's probably the most profitable show on the whole BBC. If anything was ring fenced from cuts, it would be TG.

Plus all the merchandise: DVD's/books/board games etc and selling makers rights to other countries.

 

Definitely the most profitable show on the BBC I'd wager. ;)

 

Its irrelevant, what the program makes in revenue, TG is estimated

 

to make £160 mill PA for Auntie Beeb, so to be PC it cannot be treated any

 

different to any other program produced by them.. :scare:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is brilliant that the other TV networks are taking the pi55 out of the Clarkson suspended fiasco,

 

Channel 4 news rocked up at his house with a steak sandwich.

 

Fifth Gear posted a promo saying 'no producers were

harmed in the making of this episode' it kinda puts the whole thing

 

in to perspective, an over reaction by the Beeb :scare:

Edited by WhackyWill
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They cannot be seen under the new BBC charter to favor one program over another...!

And back in the real world...

 

Come on Will, I know you're not that naive to believe that. Of course they're allowed to favour one program over another, else you'd end up with every programme having the same budget. Antiques Roadshow does not have to have as much priority as EastEnders, for example.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And back in the real world...

 

Come on Will, I know you're not that naive to believe that. Of course they're allowed to favour one program over another, else you'd end up with every programme having the same budget. Antiques Roadshow does not have to have as much priority as EastEnders, for example.

 

Surely, if anything, you'd end up with all 7 (?) channels showing the same one programme 24 hours a day. Overlooking budgets for a moment, if there's no favouring of programmes then they'd have to show the same programme at prime time as they would during the day. And they can't air that one programme on the more popular BBC1 whilst another gets shown on one of the less popular channels....

 

Everything the BBC does, everything, is based on favouring it's programmes.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They cannot be seen under the new BBC charter to favor one program over another...!

And back in the real world...

 

Come on Will, I know you're not that naive to believe that. Of course they're allowed to favour one program over another, else you'd end up with every programme having the same budget. Antiques Roadshow does not have to have as much priority as EastEnders, for example.

 

Just saying how it works in 2015..

 

Say for example your Production budget for your programmer was £1 mill in 2014.

 

New budget is set at £700k, so as producer you have a meeting with your production Team

 

and you all agree it cannot be made for that, so you go back to the board cap in hand and

 

after many many meetings with them they may at their discretion increase your budget

 

or reduce the number of shows..Does that sound familiar..reduce the number of shows..!! :scare:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And back in the real world...

 

Come on Will, I know you're not that naive to believe that. Of course they're allowed to favour one program over another, else you'd end up with every programme having the same budget. Antiques Roadshow does not have to have as much priority as EastEnders, for example.

 

Surely, if anything, you'd end up with all 7 (?) channels showing the same one programme 24 hours a day. Overlooking budgets for a moment, if there's no favouring of programmes then they'd have to show the same programme at prime time as they would during the day. And they can't air that one programme on the more popular BBC1 whilst another gets shown on one of the less popular channels....

 

Everything the BBC does, everything, is based on favouring it's programmes.

 

Everything the BBC does is done on COST..!!!! :scare: :scare:

Edited by WhackyWill
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every the BBC does is done on COST..!!!! :scare: :scare:

 

Quite. So it's going to favour those programmes which actually make money then isn't it?!

 

No not at all, the BBC does not need to schedule its programes to attract advertising revenue

 

like Commercial Channels have to. We pay for it, and the BBC has to make major cuts over

 

the next 3 years, as any increase in the TV licence had been put back. Yes the revenue from TG

 

goes back into the overall "pot"... :scare:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is brilliant that the other TV networks are taking the pi55 out of the Clarkson suspended fiasco,

 

Channel 4 news rocked up at his house with a steak sandwich.

 

 

Fifth Gear posted a promo saying 'no producers were

harmed in the making of this episode' it kinda puts the whole thing

 

in to perspective, an over reaction by the Beeb :scare:

Surely, until the facts are known who knows if it's an over reaction or not :shrug:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is brilliant that the other TV networks are taking the pi55 out of the Clarkson suspended fiasco,

 

Channel 4 news rocked up at his house with a steak sandwich.

 

 

 

Fifth Gear posted a promo saying 'no producers were

harmed in the making of this episode' it kinda puts the whole thing

 

in to perspective, an over reaction by the Beeb :scare:

Surely, until the facts are known who knows if it's an over reaction or not :shrug:

 

 

He shouted at a few people, because he had just done a 14 hour day in snow and slush

 

which didn't go very well, got to the "boarding house" they had been booked into to be confronted

 

by a few Mum's Dad's and kids wanting "selfies" with him, then discovered the producer had not bothered to

 

arrange any hot food for them. I would also be pi55ed of with this..Nobody got hit..it was a shouting

 

match and handbags at dawn..!! :surrender: :surrender:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

He shouted at a few people, because he had just done a 14 hour day in snow and slush

 

which didn't go very well, got to the "boarding house" they had been booked into to be confronted

 

by a few Mum's Dad's and kids wanting "selfies" with him, then discovered the producer had not bothered to

 

arrange any hot food for them. I would also be pi55ed of with this..Nobody got hit..it was a shouting

 

match and handbags at dawn..!! :surrender: :surrender:

 

I think anyone would be p!$$ed at that ... I certainly would

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One last try.

 

Yes the revenue from TG

 

goes back into the overall "pot"... :scare:

 

So if Top Gear earns the BBC

 

TG is estimated

 

to make £160 mill PA for Auntie Beeb

 

It's going to favoured over, say, a Jack Whitehall "sitcom" that aired twice on BBC Three at 3am on a Wednesday. Regardless of what the BBC Charter says.

 

Any business is going to favour profitable products over less profitable products. Including the BBC. They're not just going to chuck away £160m (or whatever it actually is) for the sake of "appearing PC".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One last try.

 

Yes the revenue from TG

 

goes back into the overall "pot"... :scare:

 

So if Top Gear earns the BBC

 

TG is estimated

 

to make £160 mill PA for Auntie Beeb

 

It's going to favoured over, say, a Jack Whitehall "sitcom" that aired twice on BBC Three at 3am on a Wednesday. Regardless of what the BBC Charter says.

 

Any business is going to favour profitable products over less profitable products. Including the BBC. They're not just going to chuck away £160m (or whatever it actually is) for the sake of "appearing PC".

 

OK whatever you say..Take it up with the DG that's (The Director General) . I'm going to bed..!!! :surrender: :surrender:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...