WINKJ Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 Guessing that it flew past you on a straight? Think so, was going too quick for me to get a good close look. May of been a Ferrari. Not sure similar shape, understandable mistake same gorgeous rosso cors red too, pretty sure it was a hot hatch ferrari now. 3 exhaust pipes too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMballistic Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 "350Z Vs Soda Fabia RS", ....could be worse, I've just seen this Volvo Amazon beat a Ferrari 599 GTB F1. Source: http://www.worldcarfans.com/114101382732/volvo-owner-claims-he-has-the-fastest-car-in-britain 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J4CKO Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 A 350Z should be a quicker, by 3 sec to 100, not a huge margin but they are quicker, on the road it doesn't always pan out like that, especially with tuned vs standard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zxrob Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 Cars A bit like some of the women I've known pig ugly fat ****er that was a real goer Silky sexy blonde that, well, wasn't Ro 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ceejay29 Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 Cars A bit like some of the women I've known pig ugly fat ****er that was a real goer Silky sexy blonde that, well, wasn't Ro Wise words 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grundy Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 My god this thread still going... #teamtarmac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richf Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 A 350Z should be a quicker, by 3 sec to 100, not a huge margin but they are quicker, on the road it doesn't always pan out like that, especially with tuned vs standard. If that was the case then that would be reflected in the 1/4 mile times since the terminal speeds are about 100mph for both but the difference is around .5 of a second On the circuit the vrs is no slouch either of course that's not what the fan boys on here want to hear but I've driven the 350z and owned a 350hr and now own a 370z As for comments I've had about the same amount of positive comments on both cars but I didn't buy my cars for any kind of kudos unlike some and couldn't give a fig what other people think Enjoy the zed for what they are but there are lots of quickens cars out there that's just a fact 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevoD Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 Yea and there's quicker than Porsche quicker than Ferrari and quicker than buggati There's always something quicker 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flex Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 My god this thread still going... #teamtarmac You still came back for a nose around didn't ya! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grundy Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 My god this thread still going... #teamtarmac You still came back for a nose around didn't ya! Just perving around to see who has the biggest 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMballistic Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 My god this thread still going... #teamtarmac You still came back for a nose around didn't ya! Just perving around to see who has the biggest ^^ Lol. Just a warning: do not search on google for "massive c**k". You won't like what you find. Adjusted my search for "massive cockerel" and found this guy, so he wins... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AliveBoy Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 (edited) She just loves the cockerel: Edited October 16, 2014 by AliveBoy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J4CKO Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 A 350Z should be a quicker, by 3 sec to 100, not a huge margin but they are quicker, on the road it doesn't always pan out like that, especially with tuned vs standard. If that was the case then that would be reflected in the 1/4 mile times since the terminal speeds are about 100mph for both but the difference is around .5 of a second On the circuit the vrs is no slouch either of course that's not what the fan boys on here want to hear but I've driven the 350z and owned a 350hr and now own a 370z As for comments I've had about the same amount of positive comments on both cars but I didn't buy my cars for any kind of kudos unlike some and couldn't give a fig what other people think Enjoy the zed for what they are but there are lots of quickens cars out there that's just a fact Was just going off the figures I found, 17 ish to 100 for the Fabia and 14 ish for the 350Z. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docwra Posted October 18, 2014 Share Posted October 18, 2014 Was just going off the figures I found, 17 ish to 100 for the Fabia and 14 ish for the 350Z. I think thats the old one mate, the newer version will do a quarter in 15 seconds, thi seems to be about the mark for hot hatches these days Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J4CKO Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 The old one was the diesel, this was the info, http://fastestlaps.com/cars/skoda_fabia_rs.html A lad I know had the diesel and reckoned it would be on a par with my 250 bhp Saab 9-3 Aero, it wasnt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock_Steady Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 those bloody Saab Aeros (waves fist) they are pretty quick! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 those bloody Saab Aeros (waves fist) they are pretty quick! That's hardly a surprise since with a few basic mods and a remap a 2.8T can easily have more power than the zed . Doesn't stop it from being a fridge on wheels though. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J4CKO Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Mine was a 2.0T, with the BSR Remap, would say it was pretty much as quick as my Zed, wouldn't go so far as to call it a fridge on wheels, was a pretty decent car but it didnt have a lot of personality in comparison to the Zed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock_Steady Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 (edited) those bloody Saab Aeros (waves fist) they are pretty quick! That's hardly a surprise since with a few basic mods and a remap a 2.8T can easily have more power than the zed . Doesn't stop it from being a fridge on wheels though. it was a surprise to me as I knew nothing about them, especially when I was trying to outrun a Saab in my GT4 and it kept up with me no probs. Edited October 21, 2014 by Rock_Steady Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G1uk2010 Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Mine was a 2.0T, with the BSR Remap, would say it was pretty much as quick as my Zed, wouldn't go so far as to call it a fridge on wheels, was a pretty decent car but it didnt have a lot of personality in comparison to the Zed. I had the same and found that it would keep with a Z.... just... but fwd and loads of torque steer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docwra Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 those bloody Saab Aeros (waves fist) they are pretty quick! That's hardly a surprise since with a few basic mods and a remap a 2.8T can easily have more power than the zed . Doesn't stop it from being a fridge on wheels though. it was a surprise to me as I knew nothing about them, especially when I was trying to outrun a Saab in my GT4 and it kept up with me no probs. In the early 90's the Saab 9000 Aero had the fastest 50-70 time of any production car IIRC, including the Diablo, Ive just read that the 9-3 Aero was quicker 40-70 than the 911 turbo of the time as well, not so sure on that one TBH. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 In the early 90's the Saab 9000 Aero had the fastest 50-70 time of any production car IIRC, including the Diablo, Ive just read that the 9-3 Aero was quicker 40-70 than the 911 turbo of the time as well, not so sure on that one TBH. I'd seriously question that, especially the Diablo bit. There is no way a normal production 220hp car could beat a 500hp car from a rolling start in any mph range. Might be possible by using very short gears like on rally cars, or stripping it down to 500kg or something. Probably just another urban legend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevoD Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 ^^ bit like mpss tyre then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docwra Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 In the early 90's the Saab 9000 Aero had the fastest 50-70 time of any production car IIRC, including the Diablo, Ive just read that the 9-3 Aero was quicker 40-70 than the 911 turbo of the time as well, not so sure on that one TBH. I'd seriously question that, especially the Diablo bit. Call Saab then Its actually 50-70 in top gear but nonetheless thats still pretty impressive as the Saab was geared for 180+ in top .......... they also did 40-80 quicker than a Testarossa. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asad Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 Quick little cars these skodas. Zed is abit more of a drivers car and not just about straight line speed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.