Jump to content

25 Years of MISERY


ianphampton

Recommended Posts

Last weekend I was travelling south on the joyous major artery known as the M6. My son was reading a 1990 'Performance Ford' magazine (given to him by a neighbour clearing out his back room preparatory to moving)

 

I have attached the scan of the magazine but the relevant section says:-

 

"The low spots [of 1989] have been virtually every time that I have had to go on the M1, M5, M6 or M25. All four are hopelessly inadequate, and deeperately need to be widenend; even as I write Steve Wright is on Radio One with news of a 16 mile tailback on the M6 and a similar one hold-up on the M25 . . . ."

 

Maybe it's me but I fail to understand how any agency (Dept of Transport / Highways Agency) can be so poorly managed and have so poor a record that after 25 years ( 25 YEARS!!) they have not progressed to any sort of solution.

 

Ah well, rant over, no doubt it will all be the same in another 25 years but by then we'll all be in a queue of robot controlled 3 cylinder diesels and all doing 50mph for fuel efficiency and the beloved Health and Safety - you know, the sort of driving experience we all love and relish. :rant:(Sorry about that lst bit of vituperation)

 

1990-JanPerformanceFord_zps09b91342.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it not unavoidable that on a one way style road that if an accident occurs, particularly if serious, delays will be severe due to the closure as you literally have no escape route or road. Whilst increasing the capacity, its not going to stop accidents. Perhaps they need better contingency plans to get or keep the traffic flowing in such an event?

 

But agree in part, the road network cannot cope with the volume of traffic in general.

 

I think people should be encouraged to use m ways at off peak times, I.e 10pm to 6 am, particularly haulage compaines and in this day and age of flexible working hours, the gov need to do more to spread the volume!

Edited by Jetpilot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read somewhere that they are now taking away the Hard Shoulder

 

on the M25 and using it as a 4th lane..That will cause chaos, especially if you

 

break down, very good chance of you getting killed. :scare: :scare:

It's already happened in Kent and has been likewise on M42 for atvleast a couple of years, has improved traffic flow considerably in both cases and I'm sure we would have heard if there had been a disaster. There are emrgency refuge areas and the sections of motorway are permantly monitored by cctv and all have overhead gantry lane control too.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But there were probably a quarter of the cars 25 years ago compared to now - definitely more lanes on motorways and more taxation on fuel to make you use cars less, but its just keeping up with population growth and vehicle usage, it can't outpace it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

more taxation on fuel to make you use your car less

 

All well and good but what about people that have no choice that have to use a vehicle for work?

 

Clearly its not aimed at them (even though they are affected - but companies like BP offer fuel cards to VAT registered businesses to get reductions in the cost) but at your lazy driver who could use public transport as an alternative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read somewhere that they are now taking away the Hard Shoulder

 

on the M25 and using it as a 4th lane..That will cause chaos, especially if you

 

break down, very good chance of you getting killed. :scare: :scare:

It's already happened in Kent and has been likewise on M42 for atvleast a couple of years, has improved traffic flow considerably in both cases and I'm sure we would have heard if there had been a disaster. There are emrgency refuge areas and the sections of motorway are permantly monitored by cctv and all have overhead gantry lane control too.

 

Hum..shows what I know about motorways, :shrug:

 

Use M1 occasionally to Luton Airport, M25 sometimes to Stansted Airport & M4 to London Airport.

 

I know everything about the North Circular though..!! :thumbs:

Edited by WhackyWill
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

more taxation on fuel to make you use your car less

 

All well and good but what about people that have no choice that have to use a vehicle for work?

 

Clearly its not aimed at them (even though they are affected - but companies like BP offer fuel cards to VAT registered businesses to get reductions in the cost) but at your lazy driver who could use public transport as an alternative.

 

You then make driving a luxury that only the wealthy will be able to afford, plus the government wants you in your car, they dont really want you on public transport, they cant afford for you not to drive!

 

Imho they need to offer incentives to car share, out of city parking, like a park and ride, etc

Edited by Jetpilot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read somewhere that they are now taking away the Hard Shoulder

 

on the M25 and using it as a 4th lane..That will cause chaos, especially if you

 

break down, very good chance of you getting killed. :scare: :scare:

It's already happened in Kent and has been likewise on M42 for atvleast a couple of years, has improved traffic flow considerably in both cases and I'm sure we would have heard if there had been a disaster. There are emrgency refuge areas and the sections of motorway are permantly monitored by cctv and all have overhead gantry lane control too.

 

Yup M42 was hugely improved with the 4th lane. The gantry will advise if you can drive or not in the 4th (hard shoulder). X marks no way Jose and 40-60mph shows that it's open.

 

I think it's brilliant because every other bugger drives lanes 1-3, so I chop down 4 just ever so slightly faster than all the other cars, only because they're doing 5mph under the gantry specified speed!!! :lol:

 

I call it the "I'm not an idiot lane"

 

PULL IN TO THE LEFT YOU IDIOTS!!!!! It's a free lane, use the damn thing!! :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read somewhere that they are now taking away the Hard Shoulder

 

on the M25 and using it as a 4th lane..That will cause chaos, especially if you

 

break down, very good chance of you getting killed. :scare: :scare:

It's already happened in Kent and has been likewise on M42 for atvleast a couple of years, has improved traffic flow considerably in both cases and I'm sure we would have heard if there had been a disaster. There are emrgency refuge areas and the sections of motorway are permantly monitored by cctv and all have overhead gantry lane control too.

 

Hum..shows what I know about motorways, :shrug:

 

Use M1 occasionally to Luton Airport, M25 sometimes to Stansted Airport & M4 to London Airport.

 

I know everything about the North Circular though..!! :thumbs:

I'd settle for that little Motorway use!! :surrender:
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read somewhere that they are now taking away the Hard Shoulder

 

on the M25 and using it as a 4th lane..That will cause chaos, especially if you

 

break down, very good chance of you getting killed. :scare: :scare:

It's already happened in Kent and has been likewise on M42 for atvleast a couple of years, has improved traffic flow considerably in both cases and I'm sure we would have heard if there had been a disaster. There are emrgency refuge areas and the sections of motorway are permantly monitored by cctv and all have overhead gantry lane control too.

 

Hum..shows what I know about motorways, :shrug:

 

Use M1 occasionally to Luton Airport, M25 sometimes to Stansted Airport & M4 to London Airport.

 

I know everything about the North Circular though..!! :thumbs:

I'd settle for that little Motorway use!! :surrender:

 

or North Circular, A13, M25, A20 Brands Hatch, :yahoo:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it not unavoidable that on a one way style road that if an accident occurs, particularly if serious, delays will be severe due to the closure as you literally have no escape route or road. Whilst increasing the capacity, its not going to stop accidents. Perhaps they need better contingency plans to get or keep the traffic flowing in such an event?

 

But agree in part, the road network cannot cope with the volume of traffic in general.

 

 

 

Adding extra lanes, well for a start it's very expensive, imagine the cost of widening for example the M6/M5 bottleneck junction in Birmingham. Buying up land is also very expensive, the proposed M4 relief road will cost £1 billion, much of that in compulsary purchase, for just a 14 mile stretch around Newport. There were plans to widen the A55 in North Wales to 3 lanes but the cost was horrendous. The 2 lane 1 mile long tunnel under the River Conway which cost around £150 million in the 1980's would cost a further £500 million to add an extra lane and with the other tunnels that would need to be widened, junctions altered, etc we're looking at several billion. I know that the proposed widening of a 5 mile section by our house was costed out at £250 million in 2006, you're probably looking at £400-£500 million today (more than the entire annual budget for road building in Wales).

 

Accidents are the main problem and widening roads will in general make little difference in reality. We were extremely short sighted in the 60's in ripping up our railways, mind you it didn't help that at that time the minister of transport was one Ernest Marples, managing director of Marples Ridgeway which constructed much of our early motorways.

 

Pete

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...