Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've done a quick search and can't find this on here but I came across this, now, legendary thread via Scoobynet. It seems the whole car community is giving this guy grief. Warning - it is a long read!!

 

Clicky

Posted

I had a quick read of this yesterday after seeing it on ScoobyNet, but it seems to have grown 10 pages since :teeth:

 

The general gist, was that Imran was selling a car that he maintained was genuine but the mod on the board produced photos of it badly crash damaged and evidence of his IP being used to buy replacement parts from eBay, yet he still insisted the car was straight :dry: Rumbled, big time :headhurt:

Posted

Yeah, the sheer volume of traffic has crashed the site. I think every car forum in ther UK had got a link to it as well as computer forums. Its even got links to car forums in the states. Keep trying, its worth a read. The guy keeps maintaining his innocence despite the overwhelming evidence against him.

Posted

Only got to the first page before crashed so the knob is trying to sell a car that is right off and act like its never been in a crash am I right. I hate people like that proper con artists just be honest :rant:

Posted

holy crap just read second page waiting for third to load the giy is imi and imradvx, from ip account can confirm that the same guy who says he is oblivious to any crash was the same guy who logged in under different names and said about his crash, sheeze he should be arrested people like that are scum :thumbdown:

Posted

It's worth sticking with if you can. I've read 30 pages now having followed it for the last few days however the traffic is making it difficult to follow at the moment. I'm still not telling you what happens though :p

Posted
What a load of shite.

 

They claimed to have evidence but never posted it.

 

I think they were saying that cos they are moderators they have a responsability to protect people who came forth with the evidence but could not post on open forum otherwise they would break the confidentuality act with their members no? :blush:

Posted

True and completely understandable but evidence can be presented without dropping names.

 

Of course I'm not defending your man but they really dug into him before anyone said they had evidence. All they had to say was "we know one of the past owners of car number 16 and it was rolled". End of story.

Posted
True and completely understandable but evidence can be presented without dropping names.

 

Of course I'm not defending your man but they really dug into him before anyone said they had evidence. All they had to say was "we know one of the past owners of car number 16 and it was rolled". End of story.

 

my man????

Posted
True and completely understandable but evidence can be presented without dropping names.

 

Of course I'm not defending your man but they really dug into him before anyone said they had evidence. All they had to say was "we know one of the past owners of car number 16 and it was rolled". End of story.

 

my man????

 

Irish turn of phrase - he doesn't think you're sleeping with him. Are you? ;)

Posted

Sorry, it's an everyday Irish phrase. If it were a woman I'd of said "your one". :teeth:

 

I should of said "Of course I'm not defending that bloke but...."

Guest prescience
Posted
What a load of shite.

 

They claimed to have evidence but never posted it.

 

Cheers, you've saved me a considerable amount of wasted effort trawling through all 30 pages :thumbs:

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...