Can this be right

[Dave172]

if the 0-100 is right how can the 1/4 mile or am i missing somthing ?? check it out http://www.fastestlaps.com/comparisons/nissan_350z_283bhp-vs-nissan_350z_308bhp.html

[rtbiscuit]

older car is lighter and has more torque

[Dblock]

Could be a worse start, more wheelspin etc etc. Generally the 313's are good bit faster as its only a small amount of weight I'm sure.

[rtbiscuit]

real world driving would put both across the line at about the same time think the 313 would maybe have half a cars length.

 

but the 313 is a better smoother drive with a bettet box; interior and feel. the older ones are more raw.

[DannyBoy]

You're right though Dave 172, that really doesn't make sense.

 

A good DE 1/4 mile is usually at or just under 14s at just over 100mph, so for either version of 350z the 1/4 mile and the 0-100mph are almost the same thing, as is supported by the figures for the DE. Therefore not sure how there can be such a massive difference between the two results for the HR when again they should have been amost identical.

 

As biscuit says though, 1/4 mile times aside not many people will argue against the 313 being the better car.

 

DB

[Ekona]

Different drivers, different days, different conditions, probably different tracks.

[ersen.o]

side by side my HR always takes all my makes DE whatever speed so i really doubt thats right, plus i got a stock quarter of 14.01 seconds in wet conditions at pod, so sub 14s was easily possible

 

they dont have proper specs for the HR, that website is just user generated and not right

Edited December 8, 2012 by ersen.o

[StevoD]

Hmm dont state what spec/wheels the cars are and different drivers give different results

[spursmaddave]

It's on the Internet of course it is right