Jump to content

fuel economy


Mega

Recommended Posts

Hi Chaps,

 

Are there any common issues that can impact fuel economy?

 

I currently get around 17. This is around town but in no way hammering it everwhere. I tend to change up at 3k revs tops, other than perhaps 1 or 2 full blips of the throttle in a given journey, which I only do when the car is warm

 

I was going to try the throttle adaptation and ECU reset as I am aware the car was sat for quite a while before I took ownership. I'll do this tomorrow/Fri.

 

For ref my average speed is 15mph and I have a 1h15m each way commute from Harrow to Heathrow every morning. As such I'm not ruling out the mpg as being normal given the commute I do.

 

Any opinions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest I think 17mpg is about right if your doing that speed.

 

If i only use the car around town then i see similar figures.

 

On my commute its about 45miles and I guess maybe half of that is cruising at 80mph, the rest is slow moving in traffic at about 30mph. My mpg is about 25mpg over a full tank.

 

When I had my golf TDI I became an expert in mpg and trying to increase it. The best I saw out of that was 74mpg over a 30mile trip, incl stop / start, roundabouts, door-to-door, incl starting the car from cold. Typical average mpg per tank was more like 55->62mpg.

 

Things you can do to improve it is to knock it out of gear and free wheel to a stop rather than braking, changing up as early as you can without making the engine labour. They reckon turning air con off saves 10% of fuel but I never found that made any difference. Really its all about predicting the road ahead to save you from wasting energy & fuel braking & accelerating. Also, cruising at 50mph or at least keeping it under 70 will help too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Things you can do to improve it is to knock it out of gear and free wheel to a stop rather than braking, changing up as early as you can without making the engine labour. They reckon turning air con off saves 10% of fuel but I never found that made any difference. Really its all about predicting the road ahead to save you from wasting energy & fuel braking & accelerating. Also, cruising at 50mph or at least keeping it under 70 will help too.

 

Unless the VQ35 is a very unusual engine, it'll use less fuel (some engines even use none at all) under engine braking than it will at idle in neutral, so if someone is really wanting to hypermile then 1. why did they buy a zed, and 2. they're slightly better off engine braking rather than coasting.

 

You're dead right about the cruising speed, the difference in MPG between 65 and 80 is huge, and it's much quieter and more relaxing too :thumbs:

 

DB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest I think 17mpg is about right if your doing that speed.

 

 

Things you can do to improve it is to knock it out of gear and free wheel to a stop rather than braking, changing up as early as you can without making the engine labour. They reckon turning air con off saves 10% of fuel but I never found that made any difference. Really its all about predicting the road ahead to save you from wasting energy & fuel braking & accelerating. Also, cruising at 50mph or at least keeping it under 70 will help too.

 

I think I'd have to disagree with you on freewheeling - correct don't use the brakes, because you have wasted the energy getting there, just use natural engine braking. Also when freewheeling the engine will use fuel to turn the engine over and keep firing, however, keep it in gear going downhill, just take you foot off the accelerator - the momentum keeps the engine turning ie use gravity to power the engine not petrol

 

I am no mechanic/engineer - so feel free to shoot me down :dance:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm guessing going from Harrow to Heathrow has a hell of a lot of stop/start driving. As Stew pointed out this is what kills MPG. This seems to be backed up with your average speed of only 15MPH. Going from that I'd say its normal. Not a lot you will be able to do with that, even with using engine braking, keeping momentum and trying to minimise start/stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Things you can do to improve it is to knock it out of gear and free wheel to a stop rather than braking, changing up as early as you can without making the engine labour. They reckon turning air con off saves 10% of fuel but I never found that made any difference. Really its all about predicting the road ahead to save you from wasting energy & fuel braking & accelerating. Also, cruising at 50mph or at least keeping it under 70 will help too.

 

Unless the VQ35 is a very unusual engine, it'll use less fuel (some engines even use none at all) under engine braking than it will at idle in neutral, so if someone is really wanting to hypermile then 1. why did they buy a zed, and 2. they're slightly better off engine braking rather than coasting.

 

You're dead right about the cruising speed, the difference in MPG between 65 and 80 is huge, and it's much quieter and more relaxing too :thumbs:

 

DB

I asked THAT question a while back... about using engine breaking vs knocking it out of gear...

 

General consensus on our engines was that it used LESS fuel under engine braking then being knocked out of gear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest I think 17mpg is about right if your doing that speed.

 

 

Things you can do to improve it is to knock it out of gear and free wheel to a stop rather than braking, changing up as early as you can without making the engine labour. They reckon turning air con off saves 10% of fuel but I never found that made any difference. Really its all about predicting the road ahead to save you from wasting energy & fuel braking & accelerating. Also, cruising at 50mph or at least keeping it under 70 will help too.

 

I think I'd have to disagree with you on freewheeling - correct don't use the brakes, because you have wasted the energy getting there, just use natural engine braking. Also when freewheeling the engine will use fuel to turn the engine over and keep firing, however, keep it in gear going downhill, just take you foot off the accelerator - the momentum keeps the engine turning ie use gravity to power the engine not petrol

 

I am no mechanic/engineer - so feel free to shoot me down :dance:

 

Hmmm. you learn something new every day.

 

What I found with the golf was that under engine braking the car would slow down quicker, whereas if free wheeling, you could happily freewheel for a much greater distance - so if i saw cars braking up ahead of me on the road I could just time it so id freewheel up to them, whereas with engine braking, the car would end up stopping too soon, and id have to accelerate again. You can cover quite a long distance sometimes through freewheeling, esp if down hill - so in effect you could be travelling at 60mph, but engine revs are just idling at 600rpm - compared to whatever revs you`d normally be pulling travelling at 60mph. I know on my golf it made a huge difference, but maybe on the zed things are different.

 

As someone else said, at any rate, the zed isnt the car to have if your worried about saving a few mpg!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very low reference speed there, mine's reading 29 with an MPG of 27.9. That's not a one off reading as I've never reset the computer since I had to change the battery 7,700 miles ago. All that mileage around town really hits MPG on a heavy car like The Zed.

 

 

Pete

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest I think 17mpg is about right if your doing that speed.

 

 

Things you can do to improve it is to knock it out of gear and free wheel to a stop rather than braking, changing up as early as you can without making the engine labour. They reckon turning air con off saves 10% of fuel but I never found that made any difference. Really its all about predicting the road ahead to save you from wasting energy & fuel braking & accelerating. Also, cruising at 50mph or at least keeping it under 70 will help too.

 

I think I'd have to disagree with you on freewheeling - correct don't use the brakes, because you have wasted the energy getting there, just use natural engine braking. Also when freewheeling the engine will use fuel to turn the engine over and keep firing, however, keep it in gear going downhill, just take you foot off the accelerator - the momentum keeps the engine turning ie use gravity to power the engine not petrol

 

I am no mechanic/engineer - so feel free to shoot me down :dance:

 

Hmmm. you learn something new every day.

 

What I found with the golf was that under engine braking the car would slow down quicker, whereas if free wheeling, you could happily freewheel for a much greater distance - so if i saw cars braking up ahead of me on the road I could just time it so id freewheel up to them, whereas with engine braking, the car would end up stopping too soon, and id have to accelerate again. You can cover quite a long distance sometimes through freewheeling, esp if down hill - so in effect you could be travelling at 60mph, but engine revs are just idling at 600rpm - compared to whatever revs you`d normally be pulling travelling at 60mph. I know on my golf it made a huge difference, but maybe on the zed things are different.

 

As someone else said, at any rate, the zed isnt the car to have if your worried about saving a few mpg!

Think diesels run a higher compression than petrol so have greater engine braking!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest I think 17mpg is about right if your doing that speed.

 

 

Things you can do to improve it is to knock it out of gear and free wheel to a stop rather than braking, changing up as early as you can without making the engine labour. They reckon turning air con off saves 10% of fuel but I never found that made any difference. Really its all about predicting the road ahead to save you from wasting energy & fuel braking & accelerating. Also, cruising at 50mph or at least keeping it under 70 will help too.

 

I think I'd have to disagree with you on freewheeling - correct don't use the brakes, because you have wasted the energy getting there, just use natural engine braking. Also when freewheeling the engine will use fuel to turn the engine over and keep firing, however, keep it in gear going downhill, just take you foot off the accelerator - the momentum keeps the engine turning ie use gravity to power the engine not petrol

 

I am no mechanic/engineer - so feel free to shoot me down :dance:

 

Hmmm. you learn something new every day.

 

What I found with the golf was that under engine braking the car would slow down quicker, whereas if free wheeling, you could happily freewheel for a much greater distance - so if i saw cars braking up ahead of me on the road I could just time it so id freewheel up to them, whereas with engine braking, the car would end up stopping too soon, and id have to accelerate again. You can cover quite a long distance sometimes through freewheeling, esp if down hill - so in effect you could be travelling at 60mph, but engine revs are just idling at 600rpm - compared to whatever revs you`d normally be pulling travelling at 60mph. I know on my golf it made a huge difference, but maybe on the zed things are different.

 

As someone else said, at any rate, the zed isnt the car to have if your worried about saving a few mpg!

Think diesels run a higher compression than petrol so have greater engine braking!

 

Not to mention a heavier flywheel and probably clutch assembly. That will slow you down a treat.

 

My commute is 30 miles each way. Thats with a few milton keynes round abouts, abit of town driving through Towcester,and some A roads (43+5). My average consumption is 24-25 MPG over a full tank. (Which lasts 7 days)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think diesels run a higher compression than petrol so have greater engine braking!

Not to mention a heavier flywheel and probably clutch assembly. That will slow you down a treat.

Surely a heavier flywheel with its greater inertia will reduce the effects of engine braking? Lighter flywheel will give you more engine braking. Or when you say slow, do you mean its harder to get up to speed? That will take more power and thus fuel if start stopping all the time ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've averaged between 24 and 24.2 in the month I've had mine and that's with a fair amount of showing it off when I forst picked it up.

 

Commute to work is a stop/start 8 miles each way and that's the furthest it has went as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Unless the VQ35 is a very unusual engine, it'll use less fuel (some engines even use none at all) under engine braking than it will at idle in neutral, so if someone is really wanting to hypermile then 1. why did they buy a zed, and 2. they're slightly better off engine braking rather than coasting.

 

You're dead right about the cruising speed, the difference in MPG between 65 and 80 is huge, and it's much quieter and more relaxing too :thumbs:

 

DB

 

Am I the only one who finds the most fuel efficient speed around 80 - 85? Dropping to 70 seems to reduce fuel economy by 2mpg. Designed as a grand tourer, I thought it would have been optimised for higher speeds.

 

*obviously, tested on a private road ;) *

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The highest I ever got and I commute everyday from Milton Keynes to London, and occasionaly use the 350z I manage a solid 33mpg averaging a speed of 78mph, about 70% of that on the motorway. So overall I can easily manage a good 450 miles off the tank

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Unless the VQ35 is a very unusual engine, it'll use less fuel (some engines even use none at all) under engine braking than it will at idle in neutral, so if someone is really wanting to hypermile then 1. why did they buy a zed, and 2. they're slightly better off engine braking rather than coasting.

 

You're dead right about the cruising speed, the difference in MPG between 65 and 80 is huge, and it's much quieter and more relaxing too :thumbs:

 

DB

 

Am I the only one who finds the most fuel efficient speed around 80 - 85? Dropping to 70 seems to reduce fuel economy by 2mpg. Designed as a grand tourer, I thought it would have been optimised for higher speeds.

 

*obviously, tested on a private road ;) *

 

I do Cambridge-London and back pretty much every weekend, and between 60 and 65 sees the least fuel used, i go by what the fuel tank says, not what the DTE and MPG readouts say, as they're suspicious at best, lol. The other week i managed to convince the DTE that London to Cambridge was about 25 miles :lol:

 

DB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I do Cambridge-London and back pretty much every weekend, and between 60 and 65 sees the least fuel used, i go by what the fuel tank says, not what the DTE and MPG readouts say, as they're suspicious at best, lol. The other week i managed to convince the DTE that London to Cambridge was about 25 miles :lol:

 

DB

 

I do alot of Newcastle to Manchester trips and the little dials like DTE help keep me entertained (for a couple of seconds). I'll try 60 on my next trip if it doesnt drive me insane.

 

I think the DTE changes depending on your immediate average fuel consumption. ie. if your getting 10mpg the computer calculates the remaining distance based on that. If you then go from 10 to 30mpg, the computer re calculates the remaining distance using the new figure. Hence your DTE 25 mile difference between London and Cambridge was because you improved your fuel consumption. I have seen my DTE go up as im driving!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...