Husky Posted September 24, 2010 Share Posted September 24, 2010 At 8.30am on October 25 2006, Eddie Thompson answered the door of his east London home. He thought his visitor was an engineer coming to read his gas meter. But Mr Thompson, a school caretaker, was met by Scotland Yard detectives who arrested him on suspicion of downloading child pornography. His arrest was the beginning of a four-year ordeal which ended only yesterday when Neil Weiner, a handyman at the same school, was jailed for 12 years for putting the indecent images on Mr Thompson's laptop. It was an attempt to get him sacked because he found him difficult to work for and because he hoped it would lead to a promotion. The Old Bailey heard that Mr Thompson's picture had appeared on the front page of his local newspaper alongside the allegations after Weiner, 40, alerted them to the story. The 62-year-old was shunned by his neighbours, who thought he was a paedophile. He spent eleven hours in police custody and was placed on bail for the next eight months. He was suspended from his job of 13 years, and he and his wife were spat at in the street. The nightmare ended when two of the detectives who arrested Mr Thompson suspected he had been set up and discovered Weiner was behind the plot. Passing sentence, Judge David Paget said that Weiner's scheme, carried out against a "decent and honest man", was "wicked" adding: "It is difficult to imagine a more cunning, deceitful or warped code of conduct." Mr Thompson, who sat in the court to watch Weiner being sentenced, admitted he was shocked by the length of sentence, but said: "I think he has got what he richly deserved. Because of him it could have been me in that dock for something I didn't do." Weiner's plan began in June 2006 when, after working with Mr Thompson for just over a year, he told friends at a barbecue of his dislike for the Glaswegian caretaker and how he planned to frame him by planting child pornography on his computer. He learned the password for Mr Thompson's laptop by looking over his shoulder in their shared office. Weiner then downloaded 177 indecent images - some of them at level 4, the second most serious category - and stored them on a disc. He then copied them to Mr Thompson's laptop and changed the date the images were downloaded, making it appear as if they had been on the computer for longer than Weiner had worked with Mr Thompson. In July and August 2006, he made calls to the police under the false name of "Steve" and told them that Mr Thompson, a caretaker at Swanlea Secondary School, in Whitechapel, east London, had been downloading child pornography. He also sent officers a disc which he said contained examples of the pornography. When he was arrested, Mr Thompson immediately told officers he thought he had been set up. He was released on bail, but in January 2007 Weiner phoned the local newspaper and tipped them off. Mr Thompson's name and photograph was displayed on the front page and he was ostracised by friends and neighbours. He was forced to move out of his house and found that colleagues at school were ignoring him. But police were beginning to realise that Mr Thompson had been set up. Firstly, none of the images on the disc sent by "Steve" matched with the images found on Mr Thompson's computer. And, the 177 images on the computer had been put there in 31 seconds, which means they could not have been downloaded from the internet - that would have taken much longer - but had been placed there via a disc. Officers traced the mobile phone number "Steve" had given them and found it had been used in a phone belonging to Weiner. He was arrested and charged with perverting the course of justice and two counts of possession of indecent images. Yesterday, as well as the 12 year sentence, Weiner, a married father-of-two, was placed on the sex offenders' register for life, and the judge warned him that prison would be a difficult place for him. "The prison population is not renowned for being particularly fair or reasonable," he said. "You will be suspected by many of being a paedophile and, like Mr Thompson, you may find that you suffer, both in prison and on release, for the rest of your life." The judge said he hoped the case received wide publicity in order to restore Mr Thompson's reputation. As for Weiner, Mr Thompson said: "What he did was so stupid and unnecessary. It makes me sad because what he tried to do to me is the very thing he ended up doing to himself." http://www.independent.ie/world-news/eu ... 51543.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geoff-r Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 Haha that is sweet justice. I'm sure plenty more justice will be handed out to him in jail and rightly so. You see what they do to people like this in countries where the prison system isn't so 'fair'? I wouldn't go so far as to agree to it but it is deserved. As for the poor guy who got set up I feel very sorry for him, I hope he manages to move on with his life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Husky Posted September 26, 2010 Author Share Posted September 26, 2010 lets hope so, must have been difficult :S Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maccaman Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 How evil can some people be? Justice has certainly been served & I just hope that Mr Thompson can get treated correctly by the people who doubted him. My ex father in law was wrongly accused by a relative, though it never went past the police stage. Fortunately we never doubted his innocence but I know how much anguish it caused him & his loved ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geoff-r Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 I can't even imagine it, it would have been a living hell and he must have been one hell of a strong guy and by the sounds of it his wife stood by him. Bring back the death penalty we're too soft on criminals for such serious crimes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwanageDave Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 I can sympathise with the poor bloke, only last year i was accused of swearing at two girls in year 5 (10yrs old) and it was the worst two weeks of my life, I knew i had'nt done it as i had a fantastic allibi being with three police officers and the headteacher (i am the site manager) and the two nice traveling men who had stolen my hord of copper piping. But just to be accused and then for two weeks be questioned by H.R over the matter was unreal, you start thinking to yourself well could i have swore at them as i do tend to have tourrettes monday to friday but only with the teaching staff, i could'nt sleep at night and felt physically sick and the worst part about living in a small town i was getting calls asking me if i had really done it. It was only after getting the Head teacher to look at the cctv cameras for the twentieth time at the area i was supposed to be in that he saw i wasnt there and lo and behold it was a teacher with the same build and shaved head as me that he started to believe me.Case dropped by county and big appology from the Head and governors. the teacher was later suspended on another case of letting a pupil blow herself up in a science practical and it was his own daughter. that it all came out, he admitted swearing at the girls for being in school but the shite kept his mouth shut hoping i would take all the blame. so good on the caretaker getting the result he deserved and i hope the other bloke is getting raped as i type. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Husky Posted September 26, 2010 Author Share Posted September 26, 2010 and i hope the other bloke is getting raped as i type. i know i shouldnt but i laughed hysterically at that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rtbiscuit Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 accusations in the teaching proffession and anything linked to it can be a career killer. its my worst nightmare. thats why i make sure i bury all the bodies at least 10 feet down on the school playing field joking aside, i'm very careful all the time how i speak and what i say, and that i make sure i don't put myself in a dodgy situation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Husky Posted September 26, 2010 Author Share Posted September 26, 2010 unless your in my house and the cameras are switched off Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DazBam350z Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 I heard this story on radio 1, hard times!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maz0 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 That case would have looked way off to any half decent forensic investigator, I'm glad he was vindicated in the end. Poor guy. The treatment paedophiles get once found out, has to be the worst of any criminal act ever. Murderers and rapists can be disliked and feared, but pedo's are found to be abhorrent. I've left houses before with a guys computer at 7am, and by 8pm that night his house was burnt to the ground. 12 years is a hefty sentence indeed. It's a shame though because sentences like that are rarely ever handed out for big offenders. I've seen guys with hundreds of thousands of levels 4 and 5 get put on the register for ten years and 2 years jail time. Pish! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarnie Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Real justice would of been to let the guy have 10 mins in the same room as the guy who had framed him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.