veilside z Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Looks wicked .... So hope it makes production B) B) http://www.motor1.com/news/134569/nissan-z-concept-debut-tokyo/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATTAK Z Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 (edited) Looks like the bastard child of a Chrysler Crossfire having been shagged by a Corvette Stingray and an RX8 Edited January 27, 2017 by ATTAK Z 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ioneabee Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 nope - not pretty at all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The G Man Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 (edited) Aherm. http://www.350z-uk.com/topic/114006-new-z/#entry1698256 Edited January 27, 2017 by The G Man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy_Muxlow Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 The back end looks a bit z4 coupe. Not a fan tbh. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Humpy Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Doesnt look good to me personally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wasso Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 RX8 front wing and as Hugh pointed out, too much crossfire going on. Sorry each angle = bag of sh!te.... I think Nissan are trying to make the Z range ugly as they move forward. 3.0 v6 bi turbo and only 400 horses, tame, chuck the economy out the window and make it fun!! I'll stick with my 350 thanks.... still the best looker of the family. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The G Man Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 RX8 front wing and as Hugh pointed out, too much crossfire going on. Sorry each angle = bag of sh!te.... I think Nissan are trying to make the Z range ugly as they move forward. 3.0 v6 bi turbo and only 400 horses, tame, chuck the economy out the window and make it fun!! I'll stick with my 350 thanks.... still the best looker of the family. IYO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nimz Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 That concept is from 2011, nobody knows what the car will look like yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikevv Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 *Frantically orders 370z Nismo to avoid disappointment* 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wasso Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 RX8 front wing and as Hugh pointed out, too much crossfire going on. Sorry each angle = bag of sh!te.... I think Nissan are trying to make the Z range ugly as they move forward. 3.0 v6 bi turbo and only 400 horses, tame, chuck the economy out the window and make it fun!! I'll stick with my 350 thanks.... still the best looker of the family. IYO Correct, I wouldn't be voicing anyone else's opinion. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 RX8 front wing and as Hugh pointed out, too much crossfire going on. Sorry each angle = bag of sh!te.... I think Nissan are trying to make the Z range ugly as they move forward. 3.0 v6 bi turbo and only 400 horses, tame, chuck the economy out the window and make it fun!! I'll stick with my 350 thanks.... still the best looker of the family. Its fugly but it wont look anything like that by the time it reaches production. 400 hp from a 3.0 bi turbo isn't bad and it should be a pretty tuneable motor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stutopia Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 At least it's not that horror show Gripz crossover! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wasso Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 What about in the 1990's 2JZ TT, they were stock c 300+ horse and that was nearly 30 years ago. With today's tech and development I'd have expected a little more. But then I do understand the need for today's red tape in relation to emissions and reliability. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.