KyleR Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 Charity workers also need to get paid... https://www.charityjob.co.uk/ The problem is, the people at the top are taking huge £250k salaries and the people on the ground, doing all the work standing in the cold rattling a box are getting nothing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juggalo Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 I give to Help for Heroes, never a problem. The fact there is a help for heroes charity is problem enough. The MOD spend billions on the means to kill folk but spend two-fifths of f@ck-all on looking after their own people afterwards. If you made those bastards pay the true cost of war we'd see a damn sight less of it. Couldn't agree more. Would be better than upon declaration of As it stands though, I have to help them out. Many go into the army because it's the best choice they have for some kind of well paid career. Unfortunatley, the price for that £22k salary can be crippling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flex Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 Charity workers also need to get paid... https://www.charityjob.co.uk/ The problem is, the people at the top are taking huge £250k salaries and the people on the ground, doing all the work standing in the cold rattling a box are getting nothing. Err, they box rattlers normally get a %, not that I begrudge them. Definitely disagree with the top boys getting so much BUT and it's a big BUT if they are bringing the money in is it justified. Comes back to the arguement of attracting the right person to do the job. I agree on principle that they shouldnt earn that sort of money but to do that sort of role I'd want 100k easy just for the stress. But if I had no financial burden I'd do it for free but probably not full time. I lose my point, if I had one, there might be one in there, possibly. Dan I think that Cat charity has too much money given the quality of that gift. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ekona Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 Nice, isn't it? I was shocked, and tbh I'd rather they just spent the money on the cats (it's a heavy old lump, can't have been cheap to ship over) but they may have had a local company do them for free so you never know. You can watch the cats here if you want https://www.blindcatrescue.com/watchus.htm 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docwra Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 The problem is, the people at the top are taking huge £250k salaries and the people on the ground, doing all the work standing in the cold rattling a box are getting nothing. Its the same as the "why do MP's get paid so much" argument though - Unicef turned over $5bn in 2015, thats more than Youtube. Any company operating at that level needs staff that can do the job, but unsurprisingly they come at a premium as not everyone knows how to handle a $1bn advertising budget or write policy for 12,000 staff in 150 countries, the fact its a charity has nothing to do with it as without these players the company wouldnt function at all. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.