Ekona

Where did the data come from? I only ask I really can't see a 986 S (assuming it's the older version on test) being over half a second slower 80-120 (which in itself is a daft measurement in the real world, but I digress) in 3rd than the 350Z. Not saying it didn't, just that it seems very unlikely to me. *EDIT* Ah, read the graph wrong, that's kph not mph so a very real world test That said, that makes the time taken even less likely IMHO.

Not as much fun on the stock exhaust though

Just go to somewhere you trust. My local Nissan dealer is ace if a trifle expensive, but then I trust them to look after the car as I've got a good rapport with them. They would get my money over an average independent every day. That said, the car is going to DMS next week for a clutch replacement as they're a good £250+ cheaper than Nissan and will do just (if not better) a job: It's only the extra distance involved that means they're not my first point of call in the first place.

If Coops is looking after her, can you not give him the money and ask if he can take it to get serviced for you? Best of both worlds then.

Turbo shove counts for a lot, and given that the 0-60 is about the same once moving the ST will more than likely pull well clear of a Zed. Chuck a £200 remap onto the ST as well and it would leave the Zed for dust. Doesn't really matter to me though as I know which I'd prefer to be driving, but that wasn't really the point I was trying to make.

Nope, because my penis is big enough thanks

Without trying to sound brash, who cares? Every car will be different and you'll never match any time that Nissan quote for 0-60 as you can't hate your car that much. The Zed really isn't about full-on power or nimble handling, it's a watered down combination of the two wrapped in a very sleek (well, for the coupe anyway!) package and that's why it's such a great car to drive. An MR2 mk3 will outhandle it and a Focus ST will out drag it, and yet I know which car I'd rather be sitting in. The Zed in any form is quick enough for the road as stock, and if it's not then I'd be looking for a different car tbh. That little rant over with, and to be slightly more helpful, try using the search function on this site to see what others have posted in the past with regards to times, and it'd be worth looking over on my350z for info as well. Carfolio has just about every piece of tech data you could want as well, although I'm sure all that info is already on the forums.

The only thing CTRs had going for them was the engine. Steering feel was rough, brakes patchy, gearchange passable and they look like breadvans, but not in a good way. I like the looks of the latest version, but again it's a step backwards with more weight and no more power.

Brilliant news, can't wait to see it in June when I go back out there!

Yours is an '05 so it's the older engine and interior. Easy as that. Easiest way is to look where your hazard light switch is: In front (06+) or behind of the gearstick. It was 2006 when they started playing around with bits.

Technically you should get an expert to look at the car and confirm it is or isn't standard. If buying from a main dealer it's not an issue as they will be regarded as experts by any court in the land, independant dealers less so and private sellers wouldn't at all unless they specifically said so on the receipt somewhere. Really we all should be asking for written confirmation from any seller stating what the car has/hasn't got but we don't. Even if they lied and you then got caught out by the insurer, you'd still have legal recourse via the civil courts against the seller for damages. In real terms no-one's that perfect so it doesnt happen, and most insurance investigators don't really care either unless it's really obvious you tried to cheat (bodykit for example) but I certainly wouldn't ever want to take the risk. Almost got caught out in my naieve younger days and I never want to go through that experience again.

Top looks better than the bottom one which looks just about as ugly a wheels as I've seen and would suit something like a Max'd Corsa. Need to see the top ones on a car really.

Must admit I wanted the FRS to be 4WD too at first, but then I realised that Ford did exactly the right thing by keeping it 2WD: All that extra weight needed would've blunted the performance and added thousands onto the cost of the car, and as they've now proved it really doesn't need 4WD to keep 300bhp usable in FWD. FWD can be very fun in the right car (Clio 182 Cup springs instantly to mind as one of the best driver's cars I've ever driven, and it's certainly got a much better engine than the Zed in) so to write it off just because of that seems a tad short-sighted IMHO. I think they're fantastic, and see them more as a budget M3 than anything else. Think about it: All that power, the looks and the handling AND you can chuck the kids in the back? Sounds like a bargain to me, along with the fact that it's still a Focus so repairs and parts will be sensible money.

That's not the point, as the onus is on the owner to declare any mods and ignorance is no excuse. If you've got a few things left to tell your insurer why not just do them all in one go and pay the £25 just once? Surely it would be worth it just for peace of mind?

I wouldn't know as I tell my insurer about everything, and that includes the tyres. Technically anything that a bog standard car doesn't come with is a mod, so if you've got your car insured as a 350Z and not a 350Z GT then you may want to give your insurer a call and make sure everything is sorted... That's an extreme, but some companies can be pickier than others. Personally I see no reason not to tell them about every last little thing you do as then you give them no wiggle room should the worst happen.

It's a modification and should be disclosed. To not do so is utterly moronic considering the initial cost of insurance in the first place.

Yellow is the better colour, but the MY06 is the better car given that they've got the same lump up front. Do you want it for the way it looks outside, or the way it looks inside? Everything else being equal, that's the real choice you're making.

I see someone else bought The Sun today then

I'd rather see a lightened version of the car than one with more power. Would be just as quick in a straight line and yet much faster through the corners and under braking, and really shouldn't be that hard to do: Non-adjustable buckets, swap the plastics and leather for carbon fibre, lose the stereo and make the a/c an option, remove the sound deadening, 18" lighter wheels, smaller battery... Get the weight down by a couple of hundred kilos and sell it for £35K-£40K and I reckon they'd have a decent seller on their hands, especially if done as a limited edition

Petrol in Europe is much the same price as it is here now so don't expect any bargains there, and if you're cruising at 70mph on a motorway then you might see 400 miles to a tank.

That's about as funny as rectal cancer.

Straight 6 I once got thumped by an old Citroen AX in a straight line when I had my VXR220. I've no idea what he was running as sadly there was no opportunity to pull over and chat, but I gave him a huge thumbs up as he went sailing past me. I've never understood why people take pleasure at beating a slower car or get angry at being beaten by a faster car, regardless of what it is. Every car has it's upsides and downsides, nothing does everything well so why not just simply enjoy owning/driving them and give a fellow enthusiast a courteous smile or nod next time? Not aiming that at anyone in particular, just an observation.

He loves them so I shan't be chasing you down any time soon, fear not! Seriously though, he thinks they're brilliant which is the main thing, but then he doesn't drive his car hard at all (literally just back and forth down the A120 to and from work) so I guess he'd appreciate the low noise and cash in his pocket more than anything.

They've done a good few hundred miles on them to and from Braintree to the airport so I should think they're scrubbed by now, but I'll give them a go in a few weeks and try again if you reckon the difference is that big.

VREDESTEIN ULTRAC SESSANTAS I've now had a chance to try these out, so here's my thoughts on them along with a comparison to the Michelin PS2s. Bear in mind that these weren't on my own car, so the comparison is between a fully-braced revup Roadster with PS2s and a stock HR coupe with the VUSeseseses (previously on RE050s which I'd also tried on road and track). Conditions were cold (3deg) and damp to dry roads. Initial impressions are quite favourable here, as the VUSs are certainly not a loud road tyre at all which makes for some pleasant cruising on motorways and the like as long as the roads are smooth. They were slightly less at home on rural B-roads, and they felt slightly jittery compared with the MPS2 which are very stable on all kinds of surface. That said, no-one really cares what tyres are like in a straight line on a motorway so I'll get to the fun bit I know the test roads very well so lack of knowledge wasn't a problem here, so I pulled away from a start fairly carefully considering it wasn't my car and I was on unfamiliar tyres, but still it's always a good idea to gauge early on what the grip levels are like so I gave it a bit of power to test and HOLY CRAPSICLES WTF BBQ the arse end was very willing to come round and stay round. I wasn't exactly ready for that but held it and carried on, having been given due warning quite dramatically. Truth be told though, that wasn't me being over heavy with the throttle nor the roads being particularly rubbish/cold/wet, I was to discover it's more a feature of the VUSs in so much as they don't have anywhere near as much grip as I'd hoped for. Now for some that may be a bad thing, and yet I'm not so convinced: The HR coupe wearing the VUS boots felt far more communicative than my Roadster in the MPS2, and once I got my head round the lack of grip I found the tyres an absolute delight and a hoot to drive on. The sidewalls are relatively soft (especially next to the MPS2) and as such they give you so much communication that you're never in a panic or a worry about what the car is going to do next, and it's very easy to get and hold an angle on the car at lower speeds than on the expensive Michelins which may not make for a faster drive over all, but it's possibly more fun. I do fear that the VUSs wouldn't stand up to a track session in the same way the MPS2s do, but you'd be having such a laugh with them on would you really care? For outright speed and grip there's no doubt in my mind that the MPS2s are still the best tyre I've yet to try on the Zed with the RE050s a very close second (what the MPS have over the 50s in the dry they lose out in the wet), but are they worth £300 more per set? If you want to go as fast as possible then yes, they are, but if you're after something that is still a decent tyre in the damp but waaaaaay more communicative then it's hard to see how you could go wrong with the VUSeseseses. They're far superior to the T1-Rs in every way for just a little more money, and are well worth considering. **EDIT** R888s are now the best tyre I've tried on the Zed, please see post on pg12 for details. Table updated to include the R888s. Specific marks Scroll within code box to view DRY GRIP R888 5 MPS2 4 VUS 3 RE050 3 T1-R 2 RE040 3 WET GRIP R888 4 (2 if torrential downpour and standing water) MPS2 5 VUS 3 RE050 5 T1-R 3 RE040 2 COMMUNICATION R888 4 MPS2 4 VUS 5 RE050 4 T1-R 2 RE040 2 NOISE R888 5 MPS2 4 VUS 4 RE050 4 T1-R 3 RE040 2 OVERALL R888 18/20 (16/20 in heavy rain) MPS2 17/20 RE050 16/20 VUS 15/20 T1-R 10/20 RE040 9/20 As always, YMMV and IMHO.