It doesn't say why he got off? Isn't it an open and shut case - he was driving, he was caught by the camera + a witness - case closed?
He had no mitigating circumstances - but that doesn't help us normal people either.
So how? There has to be a reason. I particularly like this:
"But the South Yorkshire officer denied speeding in his marked police Land Rover and has cleared after a day-long trial."
Denied speeding though the evidence showed he was? Isn't that perjury?
That sucks AND blows. The law is an ASS! I bet he was on his mobile phone too, that's why he missed the camera!!!!