rtbiscuit

That's an interior I could happily sit in

Happy b day mate

Looking good

used to be on s2ki as well

Seen worse, not bad, a little busy on the eyes, but not horrific

Not seen that before, interesting find

I still chat to Ian, he's a mate on FB, nice bloke

very true

That Dino is a stunner, its one of the few fezza's I actually like

I got better mpg out of the S2000 I have the stats on my phone as I track all fuel fills and have all data on all my cars (yes I am sad). Boot wise you'd think the s2k has a smaller boot, but with the rear strut, there's not lot in it. I could get just as much in the Honda. Zed has a slight edge depending on the shape of what your putting in. Reliability wise. Honda was faultless. The most I paid for was a new keyfob battery. Nissan on the other hand, never anything major, but always had little Nogales to sort. Not enough that you couldn't drive it, but things like clicky axles, banana bar etc etc. Ok the Honda can't take 28 speakers, but if you do get some decent ones you'll be surprised at what you can achieve. But yes the zed has better audio potential while still keeping it with useable boot space. Trick with the Honda is slim line underseat sub and amp, and a quality set of cross overs. I have funny hops, I actually found the Honda more comfortable seating wise on long journeys. Down side is if there are 2 in the car, and the roof is up, long journeys can feel cramped. If your on your own they are fine. Zed is more spacious, feels very sturdy, very easy to live with. Just depends on what you like, if you want lots of torque then the zed has it. If you like to work a gearbox and feel like part of the car, then the Honda has it. You'll need to drive both as my opinions are just that....mine...which doesn't make me right...but it doesn't make me wrong. Its the old horses for courses.

Having owned both, I preferred the S2000,i found it a more enjoyable drive. And more rewarding. Some say the zed is better if its your daily car as its a bit more comfortable size wise and with the torque you don't need to work the engine as hard as the s2k. Both are good cars, but if you put both in front of me and told me I could only take one for the week. I'd take the s2000 without hesitation. The big thing is which car best suits your driving style. Its all personal at the end of the day. What's good for me might be terrible for others.

thats because someone at the dogs trust got the message on FB, and then told his vet who told all his customers etc etc etc etc. lots of people just read stuff on FB and take it as stone cold fact. what was the last on eon here; remember the hineken beer supports **** fighting in thailand; turns out that was a load of bull, people love to panic, and be outraged and FB helps to feed this.

looking very tidy

you do know this is a huge viral scam, there are no gangs stealing pets to order for fighting, no sticking of coloured dots to advertise size of pets for baiting. it started in perth australia and its a load of b0ll0cks

my XKR is on 110,000 now, and runs fine, maintainence is everything

What another tedious post

Was good seeing it used in the range rover, I'm in the process of sorting the xkr dash in carbon

Didn't know that, suppose its another reason to buy supermarket fuel

.....no

@simonpg if you like Toyota anthracite you'll love the jag anthracite. But having on my car I have come to realise it only looks its best when it is pristine clean. Mine hasn't been cared for well by its previous owner. Lots of swirling. So the xkr is getting a repaint once I have the new body panels on. But I'm not going standard colour and I'm not sharing either. Will post up when its done.