davey_83

Melbicks Garden Centre for the 4th time and of course as before absolutely everyone welkom Numbers late time were circa 40 cars, which was AMAZING!! Date: Sunday 1st September Time: 9am *leaving 9:45am for Caffeine and Machine Location: Melbicks Garden Centre Chester Road Coleshill Birmingham B46 3HY 1) davey_83 - Lunch Again closer to the time and depending on numbers we can make plans for lunch and/or a drive out. Cheers David

@cob1980 what do you use

From my experience depth and gloss come from a polish or glaze, then a wax or sealant locks this in under the guise LSP. Id recommend Auto Finesse Triple with AutoGlym Ultra HD wax https://www.cleanyourcar.co.uk/auto-finesse-tripple-all-in-one https://www.cleanyourcar.co.uk/autoglym-ultra-high-definition-wax

@cob1980 Cheers for the reply

If Carlsberg did Zed updates Lovely work and subscribed to the new exhaust too, which HFC's did you opt for?

Ello n welkom

Lovely to see a fair amount of UKDM footage too

Looks great, stick around.

Nice work pal, looks a stunner for the new owner.

Look smart!! I fancy a pair of singles for my 350z.

£250 if wheels need a refurb & tyres are soon in need of replacement, £450 if wheels are in great shape and tyres are branded with 6mm+

Japspeed K4 with the rear resonators cut out and a pair of flexi plumbed in prior OR HKS.

Looks fabulous, will all four tips smoke?

Very much worth replacing the clutch slave cylinder, clutch flexi hose and fluid change as first action for a sticking clutch.

Best set up is meant to be the Motordyne ART pipes with XYZ y pipe, which has the option for straight through, resonated silencer or HFC. Then choose a look of y pipe back you fancy.

No good at all https://streamable.com/hw1ph

When there is a status change, ie a change in the curriculum it's not unreasonable to ask for the back up to show it's needed. When the technical guys come out of the wind tunnel and present their new front wing will increase down force without any impact to drag. They are asked to present their data to implement change against the old front wing. Crude example, but the burden is on those wishing to implement change not those who already align with the current fixture. Semantics aside I've asked a very reasonable question, to which I've heard waffle mixed with delays and ultimately a question to my question. All of which build its own picture, in the words of Peter Jones - I'm out.

Unsure of the question, but il try to answer. Gender is fine and I believe binary, anything else is a mental state. By presenting Pride parades as a positive lifestyle choice, when actual fact it isn't. If everyone choose to live their lives in the same way, the human population would die out in a single generation. By presenting that relationship with 3 women is a positive healthy surrounding for a child, where one non binary adult is in a relationship with one and have sex with another all under the same roof. To which sex is presented as not being exclusive or something to hold precious. To then later if that young girl brings home a lad one night, another lad another night, then another the following how are the parents in a position to advise against it? Trans people in sport is a bad thing, how can a trans women take pride in winning against people that were born as women? Trans men do less well in athletics, and if gender was actually fluid crossover stats would yield a similar success rate but it doesn't.

Paid

Sorry to go off topic, but Trans are Gay so kinder still ok and interesting study below https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/07/new-artificial-intelligence-can-tell-whether-youre-gay-or-straight-from-a-photograph Then was found to be less convincing............ Is it possible the AI is still correct in identifying its mark, however knows before the subject knows rendering the results as a fail? https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/03/05/ai_gaydar/

Much better chap!!!

Got a link to the data, 3rd time asking apologies to do so. We can give schools the framework? Take it you work in the public sector, mind me asking you background towards the info? Happy to leave it there also if you don't wish to reply, I've yet to see a debate of such which provides a conclusion outcome - post truth ay.

Agreed, for me anything in the media that generates hate was the desired outcome. Had a look and couldn't find any data to support same sex relationships needs to be made a class for 5yr olds. Obviously it's out there but not made easy to find. If you have a link to the study to which is shows parents are coming up short on answering such questions. Any to validate the roll out to confirm its needed, a link please. Do we collectively agree with Trans women in sports?

In order to roll out this change for teaching, surely it's warranted by a large amount of data or evidence to confirm its needed? I hear what you are saying but to warrant a lesson must clearly be able to present the need - with facts? Present these and clearly there is a need and not guesswork, that it'll fill the gap unable to currently do so by parents. Do we collectively agree with Trans women in sports?

Do you have any evidence that 4 and 5 yr children have been asking about same sex couples? Again that question IF asked primarily will be to parents, which takes all of 2 minutes to answer - I truly don't understand how just 2 minute explanation is classroom worthy?